Firstly, I think being a naturist/naturist is a self-diagnosed condition. There isn't any exact chec
- morganwells98ktsxp
- Jul 10, 2020
- 2 min read
I consider myself a naturist/naturist because the skill to be clothing-free, sky-clad, nude, is important to me. It does not obstruct with the cloth sections of my life, but being a nudist/naturist is on the list of features with which I 'd describe who I 'm. Will I drive extra miles to get to your nude beach rather than cease at a fabric beach? Will I go to a whole lot of trouble to get into a place or an event where I can feel the spiritual comfort of being nude with other naked people? Do I find myself believing, in some textile situation, "Gee - it'd be fine to be naked"? Will I support any naturist organization or event which helps make the point that social nudity is fine? Do I support folks to give it a try? Am http://naipunnyajobs.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=familynudists.xyz/tag/nudists/ of being a fitter and happier person mainly because of the inclusion of social nudity in my own life? I don't believe so. http://odkazovac.cz/fwd.php?url=https://familynudism.info/searches/family-nudity-photos/6/ /naturism does not dominate my life - it's only one significant part of it.
So my own view (which I do not lay on anyone else) is that there is, in fact, more to being a naturist/naturist than simply taking part in, and/or loving, unclothed recreation. It is a question of whether or not it's important. How important? I do not know. You determine.
Mr. Sandy
John Andersen Unclothed Recreation Advocate:
For many, even the selection of naturist vs naturist carries with it almost a religious fervor and like faith there are as many variations of belief but also many commonalities.
There is also been click of discussion around the utilization of the word "recreation." For some, sex is recreational so how does that impact the term "naked diversion"? Regardless of the vagaries of the English language I see two parts to your own question. One is, "What does naturism/naturism mean in my experience?" and the other is comparable to asking "If I visit a church/sFKKgogue/temple does that make me an adherent to that special religion?".
In my own opinion it is perfectly okay to have a variety of opinions about what nudism/naturism means, and it's perfectly okay to simply see without buying into whatever doctrine has been boosted as long as you'ren't a hazard to the community.
I believe the question we really must grapple with is what defines a hazard to the community aside from bad conduct in one's presence and possibly that even varies with the local community. We can likely all agree a pedophile signifies a genuine threat, but other characteristics can vary significantly in terms of "danger variable" depending on the prevalent views of the community (as I understand FKK is painfully conscious of).
These dilemmas aren't unique to the naturist community, but are worldwide social problems which brings us full circle to the idea that naturists are just like everybody else, except they often prefer to be without clothes. Probably not, but hopefully it is food for thought.
I go nude at Lighthouse Beach and at Travasuns events, but I usually do not think of myself as a nudist or a naturist. I got involved with the Travasuns because I liked the parties and the people and one thing led to another. That's it.
--
Comments